When I’m watching a movie you can pretty much do whatever you want to the hero and I don’t mind, but if their dog dies I cry like a little baby with “no-tears” shampoo in their little baby eyes. Why is that?
According to a 2011 Harris poll, 90% of a pet dog or cat-owning Americans consider their furry cohabitors part of the family.
Moviemakers exploit our empathy for animals all the time, if we’re supposed to like a character we just met, give him a loyal dog and boom! Instant good guy.
And yes, I realize supervillains have white fluffy cats on their laps when they swivel their armchairs around, but C’mon cats are like the physical embodiment of evil.
But I guess evil things need love too, and so here we are, with cats and dogs as valuable members of the family.
They might even be the favorite member of the family because the American Animal Hospital Association surveyed married female dog owners, 40% of the women surveyed said they got more emotional support from their pet than their husbands or children.
So why do we care about animals? Or, I suppose I should narrow that down, why do we care about certain animals?
After all, most of us still eat bacon or chicken, but cringe at the thought of eating Mr. Whiskers.
It’s probably because animals like our house pets are cute.
They have big eyes, they can be kind of clumsy and dumb, and they’re innocent.
In that way, they’re an awful lot like babies, and we think of babies as cute because otherwise, it would be really easy to abandon a screaming, pooping chubby bald mini-person in the woods somewhere.
We feel attached to cute babies, even if they’re not ours.
At the 2009 University of Muenster study asked women who had never given birth to look at pictures of babies inside an FMRI machine.
The pictures activated parts of their brains associated with reward, and the cuter the baby, the more that region lit up.
Men had similar reactions, but not as strong.
Some of the same chemicals that make people go all met for babies are present when we deal with pets.
A recent study found that oxytocin, the hormone that facilitates bonding, went up 300% in dog owners who gazed into their pet’s eyes.
So it’s possible animals are hacking into our love of cuteness and by extension our instinct to protect the helpless and innocent.
But the difference is we see puppies and dogs as almost equally innocent, but it’s not the same at all with baby humans and adults.
To illustrate this, 240 students at the northeastern university were given 4 different versions of a fake news story where assailants either severely injured a toddler, a puppy, a dog, or an adult.
They were surveyed on their emotional reactions, and the puppy elicited a stronger reaction than the dog by only a narrow margin.
The adult human got the least amount of sympathy by far, and the toddler got the biggest response.
The good news is that people when it really matters will opt to save a human life over a dog.
Georgia Regents, University psychologists asked 573 people what they would do if a bus was hurtling towards a person and a dog and they could save only one.
If the dog was their personal pet and the person was an unknown tourist, the tourist would be a messy red hood ornament 40% of the time.
If the choice was between a strange tourist and a strange dog, though the tourist’s odds were much better.
They’d be unwilling bus passengers only 14% of the time. Interestingly, women were almost twice as likely to save the dog, which fits in line with the cuteness hypothesis from earlier.
So I guess if you’re going to get hit by a bus, try to do it near a man?